Why interface-name removed from group? #2495
-
|
Hello, I was using clash-verge-rev which uses mihomo and installed new version. When using my old config I got this: Does this mean I can't use As far as I understand, allowing to use interface-name on proxy group means I can have two ISP, one is stable with lower bandwidth, the other is unstable but with higher bandwidth. I can use one ISP to direct my online game and the other for browsing. And with the change I can't do this anymore unless I used proxy, which will introduce latency in online games. Or did I misunderstand something? And also, with previous use case, I assume putting them in proxy means I will have duplicate proxies instead of duplicate proxy-groups. Which is more inconvenient to change whenever I get new VPN. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
For DIRECT, we have added a As for why we removed customization on the group level, the reason is similar to the deprecation of relay: a proxy should not allow multiple possible outbound methods to coexist, as this would lead to complex resource management problems for link reuse protocols. Previous discussions can be found in #2109. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
For DIRECT, we have added a
directtype proxy that can be customized: https://wiki.metacubex.one/config/proxies/direct/.As for why we removed customization on the group level, the reason is similar to the deprecation of relay: a proxy should not allow multiple possible outbound methods to coexist, as this would lead to complex resource management problems for link reuse protocols. Previous discussions can be found in #2109.