Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

[1LP][WIP] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test.#9925

Open
sbulage wants to merge 2 commits intoManageIQ:masterfrom
sbulage:ansible_automate_new_test
Open

[1LP][WIP] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test.#9925
sbulage wants to merge 2 commits intoManageIQ:masterfrom
sbulage:ansible_automate_new_test

Conversation

@sbulage
Copy link
Contributor

@sbulage sbulage commented Feb 17, 2020 •
edited by digitronik
Loading

Purpose or Intent

  • Order Ansible service with Non-ASCII character hostname.

PRT Run

{{pytest: cfme/tests/ansible/test_embedded_ansible_services.py -k "test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii" --long-running -svvvv }}

@sbulage sbulage requested a review from valaparthvi February 17, 2020 14:07
@sbulage
Copy link
Contributor Author

sbulage commented Feb 17, 2020

Depends on #9660

@sbulage sbulage force-pushed the ansible_automate_new_test branch from 8e797c4 to 04467f2 Compare February 19, 2020 11:54
@sbulage sbulage changed the title [WIP] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 19, 2020
@sbulage sbulage force-pushed the ansible_automate_new_test branch from 04467f2 to 069b47c Compare February 19, 2020 11:56
@sbulage sbulage changed the title [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 19, 2020
@sbulage sbulage force-pushed the ansible_automate_new_test branch from 069b47c to 47a9904 Compare February 20, 2020 09:07
sshveta
sshveta suggested changes Feb 20, 2020
View reviewed changes
cfme/tests/ansible/test_embedded_ansible_services.py Outdated
Copy link
Contributor

@sshveta sshveta Feb 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use wait_for(lambda: not view.submit_button.disabled, timeout=7) instead of time.sleep

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbulage sbulage Feb 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Submit button is enabled in the UI. I have tried all possibilities with wait_for and end up time.sleep

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbulage sbulage Feb 24, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#9660 (comment)

@sshveta sshveta changed the title [RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 20, 2020
@sbulage sbulage changed the title [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 24, 2020
@sbulage
Copy link
Contributor Author

sbulage commented Feb 24, 2020

Service Dialog value is require to update Hostname after filling up, but it will not get reflected for service. We require wait for at least 5 seconds.
I have tried all possible conditions in wait_for, and end up with time.sleep.

ganeshhubale
ganeshhubale suggested changes Feb 24, 2020
View reviewed changes
@sbulage sbulage force-pushed the ansible_automate_new_test branch from 47a9904 to db13c6f Compare February 24, 2020 09:55
@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale added the test-automation To be applied on PR's which are automating existing manual cases label Feb 24, 2020
@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale changed the title [RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 24, 2020
@sshveta sshveta changed the title [WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [1LP][RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 24, 2020
@digitronik
Copy link
Contributor

digitronik commented Feb 25, 2020

@sbulage I think you are running the wrong test on PRT ^^

@digitronik digitronik self-assigned this Feb 27, 2020
@digitronik
Copy link
Contributor

digitronik commented Feb 27, 2020

@sbulage started run for test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii in state of test_service_ansible_service_name

@sbulage
Copy link
Contributor Author

sbulage commented Feb 28, 2020

@sbulage started run for test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii in state of test_service_ansible_service_name

@digitronik I have seen PRT, it is using test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii.

@jawatts jawatts assigned jawatts and unassigned digitronik Feb 28, 2020
@jawatts
Copy link
Contributor

jawatts commented Feb 28, 2020

@sbulage PRT is failing, can you take a look? Or whoever is taking your FA

@jawatts jawatts changed the title [1LP][RFR] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [1LP][WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Feb 28, 2020
@digitronik
Copy link
Contributor

digitronik commented Feb 28, 2020

@sbulage started run for test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii in state of test_service_ansible_service_name

@digitronik I have seen PRT, it is using test_service_ansible_playbook_order_non_ascii.

I edited your pytest run.
old run: http://infra-trackerbot2.cfme2.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/pr/run/1047

@dajoRH dajoRH changed the title [1LP][WIPTEST] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. [1LP][WIP] Automate Ansible non-ascii Hostname test. Mar 5, 2020
@dajoRH
Copy link
Contributor

dajoRH commented Mar 5, 2020

Would you mind rebasing this Pull Request against latest master, please? :trollface:
CFME QE Bot

@dajoRH dajoRH added WIP and removed WIP-testing labels Mar 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@valaparthvi valaparthvi Awaiting requested review from valaparthvi

3 more reviewers

@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale ganeshhubale requested changes

@sshveta sshveta sshveta approved these changes

@jawatts jawatts jawatts approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@jawatts jawatts

Labels

lint-ok needs-rebase test-automation To be applied on PR's which are automating existing manual cases WIP

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@sbulage @digitronik @jawatts @dajoRH @sshveta @ganeshhubale