Draft
Conversation
Member
Member
Author
|
I think there should be some Ampl way to make this work. Let me update to more recent versions of NLPModels by skipping some tests. If somebody that knows a bit more than I do Ampl that would be awesome! |
Member
|
@tmigot May I ask you to just quickly clean you PR such that I can merge it? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Close #127 (but need to open a new issue afterwards to use the appropriate functions from Ampl API)
Explanations: In NLPModels 0.18/0.19 we added the linear API, i.e. instead of calling
cons!you could usecons_lin!andcons_nlnto access the linear or nonlinear constraints.Indices of the (non)linear constraints are available in the meta via
nlp.meta.linof sizenlp.meta.nlinandnlp.meta.nlnof sizenlp.meta.nnln.The same applies to the Jacobian and its product.