CUDA: Update runtime and SDK to v12.8.#10353
Conversation
|
Is this the time to add the lib/lib64 symlink: |
|
Why? Note that symlinks cause full duplicates on Windows |
|
I only added it to the Linux build for that reason, so @stemann maybe you could elaborate why you need that. |
|
Cf. the discussion we had on slack in #binarybuilder - it was needed for the Faiss recipe for CMake to find a functional nvcc - I copied it from the cufinufft recipe. |
|
Only having the symlink for Linux seems strictly worse though, because packages will now still need a CMake workaround for some of the platforms. Alternatively, @giordano, could we still keep the symlink for Windows since the SDK JLLs are typically only installed on Yggdrasil? FWIW, regular CUDA toolkit installations seems to come with it: |
|
It might also not be the time - if it means that CUDA 12.8+ must be handled differently from CUDA 11.4-12.7. It could also be postponed to sometime when a rebuild of all the SDK versions are needed - though I’m not sure if there is any chance of that happening… (could BB2 trigger a change?) |
2b9eeee to
71ec555
Compare
|
OK, let's revert it then for now. |
No description provided.