Skip to content

Conversation

@tomasaschan
Copy link
Contributor

This removes some code that's no longer needed, thanks to JuliaLang/julia#10525. Hopefully, this will make it a little easier to extend the package in the future.

@timholy I assume that the method taking a CartesianIndex is an optimization. Is this somehow also provided by base Julia now?

tomasaschan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2015
@tomasaschan tomasaschan merged commit 646e28f into master Jul 22, 2015
@timholy
Copy link
Member

timholy commented Jul 23, 2015

It was more likely there to avoid an ambiguity warning. Should not be necessary anymore, I assume.

👍

@tomasaschan
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's still some work to do here, though, as noted in JuliaLang/julia#12273 (comment). Now that I know that you (probably) don't need the method for something specific, I can just remove it if I find that there's another with cartesian indexes provdided by base :)

@tomasaschan tomasaschan deleted the simplify-indexing branch September 18, 2015 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants