Skip to content

Conversation

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member

Reverts #27049

After #27182 we should be able to run the SLP by default again. Can someone one a new enough CPU confirm?

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

Do you have results on the effect this has on compile time?

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member Author

@KristofferC had some in his original PR #26594, but I haven't measured it myself.

@staticfloat
Copy link
Member

As far as I can tell, "new enough CPU" means "has AVX512", which, unfortunately, none of mine do. :(

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member Author

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @ararslan

@vchuravy vchuravy closed this Jul 25, 2018
@vchuravy vchuravy deleted the revert-27049-sk/revert-slp branch July 25, 2018 18:19
@ararslan
Copy link
Member

@vchuravy For the benefit of passers by such as myself, can you explain why this was closed?

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member Author

Mostly spring cleaning, we can keep this open, but I won't have time to work on it and keeping it open gives the illusion that I do ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants