Skip to content

More typos #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2018
Merged

More typos #8

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@

Remove jit overhead from your package and compile it into a system image.

## Usage Example
## Usage example
E.g. do:
```Julia
using PackageCompiler
Expand All @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ PackageCompiler.compile_package("Matcha", "UnicodeFun", force = false, reuse = t

# You can define a file that will get run for snooping explicitely like this:
# this makes sure, that binary gets cached for all functions called in `for_snooping.jl`
PackageCompiler.compie_package(("Matcha", "relative/path/for_snooping.jl"))
PackageCompiler.compile_package("Matcha", "relative/path/for_snooping.jl")

# if you used force and want your old system image back (force will overwrite the default system image Julia uses) you can run:
PackageCompiler.revert()
```


## Trouble shooting:
## Troubleshooting:

- You might need to tweak your runtest, since SnoopCompile can have problems with some statements. Please open issues about concrete problems! This is also why there is a way to point to a file different from runtests.jl, for the case it becomes impossible to combine testing and snoop compiling (just pass `("package", "snoopfile.jl")`)!

Expand Down