Skip to content

Revert "sort for NTuple and other iterables (#804)"#812

Merged
martinholters merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
mh/remove-sort
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Revert "sort for NTuple and other iterables (#804)"#812
martinholters merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
mh/remove-sort

Conversation

@martinholters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This reverts commit c59d116. Closes #811.

This is likely to break NDTensors, but might still be considered a bugfix as it makes Compat behave more like most recent Julia, see discussion in #811.

@ericphanson

ericphanson commented Nov 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

To run nanosoldier on this PR, a Compat.jl admin needs to get a secret from @maleadt to install the webhook on the repo: https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl/tree/master/res#repository-configuration. Then you can trigger it following https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl#reverse-ci-for-packages

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (db2077e) 92.83% compared to head (165e032) 95.34%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #812      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.83%   95.34%   +2.51%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         335      301      -34     
==========================================
- Hits          311      287      -24     
+ Misses         24       14      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@martinholters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

To run nanosoldier on this PR, a Compat.jl admin needs to get a secret from @maleadt to install the webhook on the repo: https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl/tree/master/res#repository-configuration. Then you can trigger it following https://github.com/JuliaCI/Nanosoldier.jl#reverse-ci-for-packages

Ah. @KristofferC are you an admin for this repo and can you do that?

@KristofferC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Let's try this:

@nanosoldier runtests()

@nanosoldier

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Update on PkgEvalJob 165e032 vs. db2077e: Accepted

@LilithHafner LilithHafner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the readme

Features in the development versions of julia may be added and released in Compat.jl. However, such features are considered experimental until the relevant julia version is released. These features can be changed or removed without incrementing the major version of Compat.jl if necessary to match changes in julia.

So this revert is explicitly allowed by the declared public API and therefore does not require a major version bump. Any packages that depended on this were depending on experimental features. Whether or not nanosoldier reports breakage this LGTM (unless the entire ecosystem breaks)

This should also be reverted on the 3.x branch. EDIT: it was never on the 3.x branch.

@nanosoldier

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Update on PkgEvalJob 165e032 vs. db2077e: Running

@nanosoldier

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected.
The full report is available.

@martinholters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Two PkgEval failures (ITensorVisualizationBase and ITensorGaussianMPS), both caused by

    [1] permutedims_combine_output(...)
      @ NDTensors ~/.julia/packages/NDTensors/kR4oQ/src/blocksparse/blocksparsetensor.jl:439

Thanks to @LilithHafner for actually reading the README, I'm totally fine with merging this, but we might want to give a heads-up at NDTensors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants