Skip to content

Conversation

@oxinabox
Copy link
Collaborator

As of a few hours ago 1.10.4 is the LTS

not sure how much this breaks in the tests.
I bet it does, but i hope it doesn't
Will follow up to fix those if needed

Not sure if should also update our CI setup

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.26%. Comparing base (f1c4302) to head (5ff9fe2).
Report is 24 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/template.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f1c4302) and HEAD (5ff9fe2). Click for more details.

HEAD has 148 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (f1c4302) HEAD (5ff9fe2)
152 4
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #476       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   94.33%   69.26%   -25.08%     
===========================================
  Files          24       24               
  Lines         742      615      -127     
===========================================
- Hits          700      426      -274     
- Misses         42      189      +147     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gdalle
Copy link
Collaborator

gdalle commented Jul 10, 2024

Indeed 1.10 will be the LTS but it's not the case yet and it won't be as long as 1.11 hasn't been released, right?

@oxinabox
Copy link
Collaborator Author

idk, last time LTS was changed it was indeed not til the release after it stopped being stable.
But the announcement at state of julia sounded like it was being made the LTS now.

1.11 is just around the corner anyway.

@cvigilv
Copy link

cvigilv commented Jan 1, 2025

Julia's LTS now its 1.10, any intention on revisiting this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants