[email protected] 1.21.7 (new formula)#162713
Conversation
there are some test failures with |
|
IMO we should handle the problematic 3 formulae separately from this PR. Should I move them to separate PRs? |
yeah, you can. (I actually already did one) |
Formula/c/clair.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we can also include the patch to ship with go1.22, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Patching go.mod / go.sum is prone to conflicts, so we'd have to make a new patch specifically for the old release commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are > 100 commits since the last release, confirming my suspicion: quay/clair@v4.7.2...main
|
Would it make sense to add tag |
a0c6c58 to
c38487b
Compare
|
rebased and run after #157782 merge |
|
We should remove
|
Follow-up to * Homebrew#157782 Signed-off-by: Rui Chen <[email protected]>
c38487b to
63bad93
Compare
|
13-x86_64 and 14-x86_64 are 404ing on the mirror, but it's definitely working: |
|
Any idea why would this be happening? This is not specifically related to Go, as this happens earlier, when trying to download the Go source tarball from the mirror. |
Follow-up to
Related:
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>?