Skip to content

Gsk 205 metamorphic test for categorical perturbation is not working #181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 28, 2022
Merged

Gsk 205 metamorphic test for categorical perturbation is not working #181

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 28, 2022

Conversation

@princyiakov
Copy link
Contributor

@princyiakov princyiakov commented Jul 27, 2022

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

Checklist

  • I've read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md document.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTING.md guide.
  • I've updated the code style using make codestyle.
  • I've written tests for all new methods and classes that I created.
  • I've written the docstring in Google format for all the methods and classes that I used.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 27, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@princyiakov princyiakov marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2022 10:34
@andreybavt andreybavt merged commit 0424035 into main Jul 28, 2022
@Hartorn Hartorn deleted the GSK-205_Metamorphic_test_for_categorical_perturbation_is_not_working branch September 13, 2023 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@andreybavt andreybavt andreybavt approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@princyiakov @andreybavt