Skip to content

Conversation

@seisman
Copy link
Member

@seisman seisman commented Sep 29, 2025

Check if GMT 6.5 works well with gs 10.05 and 10.06.

@seisman
Copy link
Member Author

seisman commented Sep 29, 2025

There are ~10 failures with gs 10.05.1, but these failures are all caused by tiny differences (See the artifacts in https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/pygmt/actions/runs/18094291533?pr=4125). So GMT 6.5 works well with gs 10.05.1!

Edit: Same for gs 10.06.0

@seisman seisman changed the title Bump to Ghostscript 10.05.1 Bump to Ghostscript 10.06.0 Sep 29, 2025
@seisman seisman mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2025
43 tasks
@seisman seisman added maintenance Boring but important stuff for the core devs needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Sep 29, 2025
@seisman seisman added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Sep 29, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changed images

This is an auto-generated report of images that have changed on the DVC remote

Status Path
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_interval.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_matrix.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_multiple_levels.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_one_level.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_vec.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_text_transparency.png
modified pygmt/tests/baseline/test_text_varying_transparency.png

Image diff(s)

Added images

Modified images

Path Old New
test_contour_interval.png
test_contour_matrix.png
test_contour_multiple_levels.png
test_contour_one_level.png
test_contour_vec.png
test_text_transparency.png
test_text_varying_transparency.png

Report last updated at commit abee012

Copy link
Member

@yvonnefroehlich yvonnefroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great 🙂 that there are no transparency-issues with the higher gs versions!

@seisman seisman removed the needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. label Sep 29, 2025
@seisman seisman merged commit e018a8a into main Sep 29, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@seisman seisman deleted the gs/10.06.0 branch September 29, 2025 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

maintenance Boring but important stuff for the core devs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants