Skip to content

Conversation

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member

Related to #2138.

Description of proposed changes

Fixes #

Reminders

  • Run make format and make check to make sure the code follows the style guide.
  • Add tests for new features or tests that would have caught the bug that you're fixing.
  • Add new public functions/methods/classes to doc/api/index.rst.
  • Write detailed docstrings for all functions/methods.
  • If wrapping a new module, open a 'Wrap new GMT module' issue and submit reasonably-sized PRs.
  • If adding new functionality, add an example to docstrings or tutorials.

Slash Commands

You can write slash commands (/command) in the first line of a comment to perform
specific operations. Supported slash commands are:

  • /format: automatically format and lint the code
  • /test-gmt-dev: run full tests on the latest GMT development version

@michaelgrund michaelgrund added the enhancement Improving an existing feature label Nov 25, 2022
@michaelgrund michaelgrund added this to the 0.8.0 milestone Nov 25, 2022
@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

/format

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

The name definitions are open for discussion.

@willschlitzer
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelgrund Can you add a test to test_datasets_samples.py to make sure the remote file loads correctly?

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

/format

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

/format

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

I guess that all tests fail is related to the issue discussed in #2200, right?

@seisman
Copy link
Member

seisman commented Dec 2, 2022

I guess that all tests fail is related to the issue discussed in #2200, right?

Python 3.8 tests should pass.

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member Author

/format

@seisman seisman added the final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer label Dec 4, 2022
@seisman seisman merged commit c5c404b into main Dec 5, 2022
@seisman seisman deleted the add-ternary-dataset branch December 5, 2022 06:00
@seisman seisman removed the final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer label Dec 5, 2022
sixy6e pushed a commit to sixy6e/pygmt that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement Improving an existing feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants