-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
[ JSTEP-10 ] Migrate smile module tests to JUnit 5
#553
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cowtowncoder
merged 7 commits into
FasterXML:2.19
from
JooHyukKim:joohyukkim/2.19/547-migrate-smile-module
Jan 14, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
55970d8
Migrate `smile` module tests to JUnit 5
JooHyukKim 4243b09
Migrate `smile` module tests to JUnit 5
JooHyukKim 1c50106
Clean up tests
JooHyukKim c302c3c
Remove other test module changes
JooHyukKim 49d55bd
Update SmileFactoryPropertiesTest.java
JooHyukKim bda4f97
Merge branch '2.19' into joohyukkim/2.19/547-migrate-smile-module
cowtowncoder 333500b
Merge branch '2.19' into joohyukkim/2.19/547-migrate-smile-module
cowtowncoder File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion
6
smile/src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/dataformat/smile/FloatPrecisionTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
5
smile/src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/dataformat/smile/FormatDefaultsTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
11 changes: 7 additions & 4 deletions
11
smile/src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/dataformat/smile/VersionsTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cowtowncoder One thing tho, IntelliJ doesn't provide per-package wildcard handling 🤔 minimum 3 required to use wildcard. But with that trade off, we get to order imports Jackson way that I configured like below (There are more above and below)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that ideally we'd usually left imports as-is and avoid mechanical changes.
But FWTW, the usual cut-off is 5-or-more, I think. Then again for some packages (
java.io,java.util) could use star-include for lower numbers.I think that order of imports is more important than exact threshold for start includes, if that helps? (i.e. I'd rather have strict(er) ordering than worry about explicit vs star inclusion, if only one can be restricted).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to hear that ordering comes first!
Though I hope merging into
masterdoesn't complicate as much tho