The latest version of frr bgp.conf is configured as follows: System centos8.8
router bgp 3825
bgp router-id 10.16.x.x
network 10.10.10.0/27
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
timers bgp 5 15
neighbor 10.22.x.x remote-as 3522
neighbor 10.22.x.x ebgp-multihop 2
The configuration of quagga0.99bgp.conf is as follows: System centos7.3
router bgp 3825
bgp router-id 10.16.x.x
network 10.10.10.0/27
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
timers bgp 5 15
neighbor 10.22.x.x remote-as 3522
neighbor 10.22.x.x ebgp-multihop 2
For the same machine, quagga can declare 10.10.0/27, but frr cannot. bgp is successful in both cases. According to the documentation, does frr require specifying the route?