Do you plan to enhance it for incremental models?

we could not be sure incremental materialization strategies is working well or missing sth so thats why I am asking.

[LiliaBh]

Hi,
same question. Incremental models could not be tested, is there a workaround?

[jkaczanowski-rest]

+1
an dbt_unit_testing.mock_initial() section? and/or some way to mock {{ 'this' }}?

[kborn]

+1 on this as well

[mjharper]

+1 being able to mock {{ this }}

[hugohjerten]

+1! I love this package! But without support for incremental models, we will not be able to test our most important models 😢

[psousa50]

Hello everyone,

We have created a new branch proposing an implementation of "dbt-unit-testing" that supports "incremental-models".

As you will see, our solution is a bit 'intrusive', at least for those we prefer to redefine the "ref" macro instead of using "dbt_init_testing.ref" on your models. Here you'll have to use some "dbt_init_testing.xxx", as explained in the README.

We did try to find a less intrusive solution, but our attempts seemed hacky, so we decided to keep it like this.

We are eager to hear your feedback and suggestions, so please give it a try and let us know your thoughts. We hope it will save you time and prove useful.

To access this branch, you will need to change the revision of the package as follows:

packages:
  - git: "https://github.com/EqualExperts/dbt-unit-testing"
    revision: e4a93ebd08ccd388d212b1ec636da2e467db12b9

Please do not hesitate to share your feedback with us. Thank you!

[clennox-optimizely]

I've implemented a "hacky" version of this feature (seriously, it was a mess), and this slightly intrusive macro method seems to be the best case scenario. Given that the is_incremental() macro isn't exposed in the dbt builtins you don't have much option other than a custom macro.

Regarding the custom this macro - is there any better way to do that by defining a mock on the fully qualified name of the model itself? I suspect not since dbt doesn't quote the model name when using {{ this }}, but you might have more insight than I do.

[p0tr3c]

Hey, the implemented PR works great. Is there anything I could help with trying to get this released?

[psousa50]

Hey folks, we've just published a new release (RC) with support for incremental models. It's a slightly improved version of the one above, so there's no need to change the project code now. Please try it out; we would love to hear your feedback on this 🙂

Thank you!