Skip to content

Conversation

@sameerank
Copy link
Contributor

🎟️ Fixes issue
πŸ“œ Design Doc: link if applicable

Motivation and Context

Description

How has this been documented?

How has this been tested?

@sameerank sameerank requested review from aarsilv and typotter August 7, 2025 21:23
// For server-side, we always want to keep polling for the life of the process
pollAfterSuccessfulInitialization: true,
// For server-side, we default to keep polling for the life of the process
pollAfterSuccessfulInitialization: config.pollAfterSuccessfulInitialization ?? true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ‘

Comment on lines +734 to +735
const configurationRequestParameters = client['configurationRequestParameters'];
expect(configurationRequestParameters.pollAfterSuccessfulInitialization).toBe(false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally we set a super short poll interval and verify it didn't actually try to poll, but I think peeking at the internals is fine enough.

@aarsilv aarsilv merged commit e2af172 into main Aug 8, 2025
8 checks passed
@aarsilv aarsilv deleted the sameeran/ffl-648-stop-polling branch August 8, 2025 01:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants