-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
Open
Description
Hello everyone,
I would like to ask for advice on a workflow involving PDB2PQR/PROPKA applied to a heme-containing protein–protein complex.
System description:
- The system is a protein–protein complex with a heme (HEM) cofactor located at the interface.
- I can provide the heme as a MOL2 file in which:
- all hydrogen atoms are already present,
- atomic charges have been assigned externally (e.g. AmberTools/OpenBabel),
- geometry and protonation state are fixed and chemically reasonable.
Goal:
My goal is to use PDB2PQR primarily to:
- Assign protonation states to protein residues using PROPKA,
- Generate a PQR file for electrostatic calculations (e.g. APBS),
while treating the heme as a fixed cofactor that:
- contributes to the electrostatic environment,
- but should not be modified (no charge reassignment or protonation changes).
Is there a recommended or supported way to:
- include a pre-charged heme MOL2 in PDB2PQR
- while still allowing PROPKA to titrate the surrounding protein residues?
Or is the intended/best-practice workflow to:
- exclude the heme during the PROPKA step,
- and merge it back into the final PQR prior to electrostatic calculations?
If anyone has experience with similar metallo-cofactors (heme, metal centers, prosthetic groups) or has developed a practical workaround, I would greatly appreciate your insights.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels