Merged
Conversation
jonw-cogapp
force-pushed
the
image-within-annotation-STO-106
branch
from
c19d50f to
e6ab804
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this Pull Request do?
Allows the existing
text/htmlannotations to render outimgtags. There is some very basic styling for this that tries to envisage how theimgmight come out of a WYSIWYG field, possibly being wrapped in aptagTest coverage
Yes/No: Are changes in this pull-request covered by:
Interested parties
Tag (@ mention) interested parties