Skip to content

[action] [PR:15702] [test plan] Test plan for BGP scale test#259

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/15702
May 9, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:15702] [test plan] Test plan for BGP scale test#259
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/15702

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
This test plan is to test if control/data plane can handle the initialization/flapping of numerous BGP session holding a lot routes, and estimate the impact on it.

Related PRs:

PR title State Context
[bgp-scale-test] Implement bgp scale test cases for sessions flapping, unisolation, nexthop group member change scenarios state context
[testbed] announce routes with routes generation switch, aggregate routes and variable ipv6 address pattern state context
[isolated-topo] disable ipv4 routes generation, add mocked aggregated addresses state context

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

With numerous BGP sessions holding a lot routes, any flapping on BGP sessions or routes cloud have more overhead on device, to verify the functionality and estimate convergence time, we publish this test plan.

How did you do it?

Describe three test scenarios and introduce how we measure time in test.

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
This test plan is to test if control/data plane can handle the initialization/flapping of numerous BGP session holding a lot routes, and estimate the impact on it.

Related PRs:
| PR title | State | Context |
| ------ | ------ | -------|
| [ [bgp-scale-test] Implement bgp scale test cases for sessions flapping, unisolation, nexthop group member change scenarios ](sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16069) | ![state](https://img.shields.io/github/pulls/detail/state/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/16069) | ![context](https://img.shields.io/github/status/contexts/pulls/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/16069) |
| [ [testbed] announce routes with routes generation switch, aggregate routes and variable ipv6 address pattern ](sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#15748) | ![state](https://img.shields.io/github/pulls/detail/state/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/15748) | ![context](https://img.shields.io/github/status/contexts/pulls/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/15748) |
| [ [isolated-topo] disable ipv4 routes generation, add mocked aggregated addresses ](sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#15748) | ![state](https://img.shields.io/github/pulls/detail/state/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/16213) | ![context](https://img.shields.io/github/status/contexts/pulls/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/16213) |

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] Test case(new/improvement)

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
With numerous BGP sessions holding a lot routes, any flapping on BGP sessions or routes cloud have more overhead on device, to verify the functionality and estimate convergence time, we publish this test plan.
#### How did you do it?
Describe three test scenarios and introduce how we measure time in test.
#### How did you verify/test it?

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#15702

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 8677b42 into Azure:202412 May 9, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant