Skip to content

[action] [PR:21942] [Nokia] Lower the default warning threshold for fabric capacity#975

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202405from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202405/21942
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:21942] [Nokia] Lower the default warning threshold for fabric capacity#975
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202405from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202405/21942

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

MSFT has 7 SFM cards in Nokia chassis and each FAP will have 168 fabric links up with 7SFM cards. So 85% threshold is very high, so lowering the threshold to 75%

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Lowered the threshold to 75%

How to verify it

Verified in tested bed which has 8 IMMs and 7 SFM cards with fabric capacity sys logs.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
MSFT has 7 SFM cards in Nokia chassis and each FAP will have 168 fabric links up with 7SFM cards. So 85% threshold is very high, so lowering the threshold to 75%

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
Lowered the threshold to 75%
#### How to verify it
Verified in tested bed which has 8 IMMs and 7 SFM cards with fabric capacity sys logs.
<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21942

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

vivekrnv pushed a commit to vivekrnv/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
…omatically (#21781)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-swss-common
```
* 7aa1a47 - (HEAD -> 202411, origin/202411) Added field for policer counter (Azure#975) (18 hours ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
vivekrnv pushed a commit to vivekrnv/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
…omatically (Azure#705)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-swss-common
```
* 0d42e0a - (HEAD -> 202412, origin/HEAD, origin/202412) Merge pull request Azure#19 from r12f/code-sync-202412 (18 hours ago) [Riff]
|\ 
| failure_prs.log skip_prs.log 3fa36f4 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'base/202411' into code-sync-202412 (19 hours ago) [r12f]
|/| 
| failure_prs.log skip_prs.log 7aa1a47 - Added field for policer counter (Azure#975) (7 days ago) [mssonicbld]
| failure_prs.log skip_prs.log 8f47a37 - Handle 'bulkget' in consumer_table_pops.lua (Azure#970) (3 weeks ago) [mssonicbld]
* 3f09bf0 - [code sync] Merge code from sonic-net/sonic-swss-common:202411 to 202412 (Azure#18) (21 hours ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 26cd1bc into Azure:202405 Apr 11, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant