Skip to content

[action] [PR:21056] [Mellanox] Add x86_64-nvidia_sn5610n-r0 new platform and SKUs#598

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/21056
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:21056] [Mellanox] Add x86_64-nvidia_sn5610n-r0 new platform and SKUs#598
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/21056

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has a dependency with sonic-net/sonic-utilities#3658

Why I did it

To support new Mellanox platform - SN5610N.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Add new platform folder under device/mellanox.
Also updated the new platform under asic_table.j2 file, and device_data.py.

How to verify it

Run sonic-mgmt tests on SN5610N Mellanox platform

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->
This PR has a dependency with sonic-net/sonic-utilities#3658

#### Why I did it
To support new Mellanox platform - SN5610N.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
Add new platform folder under device/mellanox.
Also updated the new platform under asic_table.j2 file, and device_data.py.

#### How to verify it
Run sonic-mgmt tests on SN5610N Mellanox platform

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21056

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 6a4acc9 into Azure:202412 Feb 10, 2025
4 of 10 checks passed
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2025
… automatically (#24047)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-platform-common
```
* fb49c9f - (HEAD -> 202505, origin/202505) Fix health check for SSD vendors: add a parser for ATP, and add a generic health ID for other brands (Azure#598) (20 hours ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
prabhataravind pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2025
…est HEAD automatically (#1644)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-platform-common
```
* 1607c2c - (HEAD -> 202506, origin/202506) Merge pull request #107 from mssonicbld/sonicbld/202506-merge (23 hours ago) [mssonicbld]
* 4ff7433 - Merge branch '202505' of https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-platform-common into 202506 (23 hours ago) [Sonic Automation]
* fb49c9f - Fix health check for SSD vendors: add a parser for ATP, and add a generic health ID for other brands (#598) (2 days ago) [mssonicbld]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
…lly (#25432)

src/sonic-gnmi

* 7238ef9 - (HEAD -> 202511, origin/202511) Add support for PHY diagnostic parameters (Azure#599) (6 days ago) [mssonicbld]
* 221e99d - [202511] Fix DPU TransferToRemote connection + unit tests (Azure#598) (6 days ago) [Dawei Huang]
* 746b1a3 - [action] [PR:588] Skip unavailable databases during redis client init (Azure#594) (9 days ago) [mssonicbld]
* 20cba51 - Use `TABLE` for `DASH_HA_` tables (Azure#580) (3 weeks ago) [mssonicbld]
* b44ce8a - Add support for CHASSIS_STATE_DB (Azure#575) (4 weeks ago) [mssonicbld]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant