Skip to content

[action] [PR:24748] [Arista] Copy QoS from LT2 to T1 for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-P32O64#1898

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/24748
Dec 17, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:24748] [Arista] Copy QoS from LT2 to T1 for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-P32O64#1898
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/24748

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-P32O64 will also be used for a T1 role and they wanted to reuse the QoS settings.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Using a symlink to point to the buffer default values values for the LT2 role.
This will make sure any fixes for LT2 will be carried over.
The same bcm config file with applied QoS settings is already being used.

How to verify it

ls -al shows buffers_defaults_t1.j2 -> buffers_defaults_lt2.j2

Tested on DUT and confirmed the buffer pools/profiles were populated and no issues during sanitize.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • msft-202503
  • msft-202511

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it

Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-P32O64 will also be used for a T1 role and they wanted to reuse the QoS settings.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
 Using a symlink to point to the buffer default values values for the LT2 role.
This will make sure any fixes for LT2 will be carried over.
The same bcm config file with applied QoS settings is already being used.

#### How to verify it
`ls -al` shows `buffers_defaults_t1.j2 -> buffers_defaults_lt2.j2`

Tested on DUT and confirmed the buffer pools/profiles were populated and no issues during sanitize.
<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [x] 202505
- [x] msft-202503
- [x] msft-202511

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#24748

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 61ba193 into Azure:202503 Dec 17, 2025
6 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant