Skip to content

[action] [PR:24198] Keep eth1 in lanemap.ini and coreportindexmap.ini for UT2 because there is no midplane intf#1702

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/24198
Oct 9, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:24198] Keep eth1 in lanemap.ini and coreportindexmap.ini for UT2 because there is no midplane intf#1702
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/24198

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why I did it

The previous makefile ignored eth1 for UT2 which caused the first asic of ut2 short of interfaces

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Skip the incrementing of i when the disaggregated_chassis=1 exists in platform_env.conf

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202503

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…re is no midplane intf

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
The previous makefile ignored eth1 for UT2 which caused the first asic of ut2 short of interfaces

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
Skip the incrementing of i when the disaggregated_chassis=1 exists in platform_env.conf

#### How to verify it

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [x] 202503

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#24198

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 0d1e170 into Azure:202503 Oct 9, 2025
12 of 17 checks passed
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2026
…tically (#25480)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-sairedis
```
* 14db8ad4 - (HEAD -> 202505, origin/202505) Add PORT_SERDES_ATTR flex counter support (Azure#1702) (4 days ago) [Dhanasekar Rathinavel]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant