-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
Adding FunctionsNetHost to worker repo #1212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | |||
| variables: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might update/adjust this file once this version is checked in.
| @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | |||
| syntax = "proto3"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could consider moving the proto files to root level on this repo so that both Worker.Grpc and host can use same proto file. Something I will investigate later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Can we have a follow up PR with that change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opened #1121 for the proto file unification.
fabiocav
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small nit comments
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # net-worker-host | |||
|
|
|||
| [](https://azfunc.visualstudio.com/Azure%20Functions/_build/latest?definitionId=201&branchName=main) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we rename the build so it doesn't carry the old repo name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will do after the new pipeline is setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the badge of new pipeline in #1214
| @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | |||
| syntax = "proto3"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Can we have a follow up PR with that change?
|
/check-enforcer evaluate |
No description provided.