Skip to content

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ @​vitest/coverage-v8 (4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

✳️ vitest (4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/expect (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/mocker (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/pretty-format (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/runner (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/snapshot (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/spy (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:

↗️ @​vitest/utils (indirect, 4.0.5 → 4.0.6) · Repo

Release Notes

4.0.6

   🐞 Bug Fixes

    View changes on GitHub

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 12 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Nov 1, 2025
@code-genius-code-coverage
Copy link

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

@korbit-ai
Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 1, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@korbit-ai
Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

@deepsource-io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits cabe223..8135f21. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateJavascript
Branch Coverage100%0%
Composite Coverage93.8%93.8%
Line Coverage93.8%93.8%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updated@​vitest/​coverage-v8@​4.0.5 ⏵ 4.0.69910069 +199100
Updatedvitest@​4.0.5 ⏵ 4.0.69810079 +199 +1100

View full report

@socket-security
Copy link

Caution

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, you must resolve all "Block" alerts before proceeding. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Block Low
Embedded URLs or IPs: npm vitest

URLs: https://vitest.dev/config/#coverage-reporter, https://github.com/istanbuljs/nyc#coverage-thresholds, https://github.com/istanbuljs/nyc#ignoring-methods, https://vitest.dev/guide/coverage#custom-coverage-provider, https://vitest.dev/guide/browser/config/#browser-name, https://vitest.dev/guide/browser/config.html#browser-provider, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_seed, https://vitest.dev/config/#sequence-hooks, https://playwright.dev, https://webdriver.io, builder.io/qwik/optimizer, builder.io/qwik, qwik.dev/core, https://vitest.dev/guide/browser/playwright, https://vitest.dev/guide/browser/webdriverio, http://foo.com, http://foo.com/, https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues, https://github.com/broofa/mime/blob/main/README.md#custom-mime-instances, https://vitest.dev/guide/projects, https://vitest.dev/config/#reporters, https://github.com/sinonjs/sinon/issues/1852#issuecomment-419622780, 127.0.0.0

Location: Package overview

From: package-lock.jsonnpm/[email protected]

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What are URL strings?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at [email protected].

Suggestion: Review all remote URLs to ensure they are intentional, pointing to trusted sources, and not being used for data exfiltration or loading untrusted code at runtime.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected]. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs
2:15PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:15PM INF 372 commits scanned.
2:15PM INF scan completed in 367ms
2:15PM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) November 1, 2025 14:15
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Nov 1, 2025
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations label Nov 1, 2025
@guibranco
Copy link
Member

@depfu merge

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 1, 2025

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 0dd07dc into main Nov 1, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the depfu/update/npm/@vitest/coverage-v8-4.0.6 branch November 1, 2025 14:16
@korbit-ai
Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations depfu size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants