Skip to content

[configurationwebhooks] Code generation: update services and models#521

Open
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/configurationwebhooks
Open

[configurationwebhooks] Code generation: update services and models#521
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/configurationwebhooks

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the automated changes for the configurationwebhooks service.

The commit history of this PR reflects the adyen-openapi commits that have been applied.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners January 28, 2026 13:57
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request contains automated updates to the configurationwebhooks service, reflecting recent changes in the underlying OpenAPI specification. The primary focus of these changes is the introduction of new data models and enhancements to existing ones, particularly around network tokenization, bank score signals, and address details. These updates ensure the client library remains synchronized with the latest API definitions, providing accurate and up-to-date service and model representations.

Highlights

  • New Models Introduced: Several new models have been added to support network token notifications, bank score signals, and detailed wallet information. These include BankScoreSignalTriggeredData, Device, NetworkTokenNotificationDataV2, NetworkTokenNotificationRequest, NetworkTokenRequestor, NetworkTokenRiskRuleData, NetworkTokenRiskRuleSource, NetworkTokenTransactionRulesResult, NetworkTokenTriggeredRiskRule, ResourceReference, ScoreNotificationRequest, TokenAuthentication, ValidationFacts, and Wallet.
  • Existing Model Enhancements: The BulkAddress model now includes Line1, Line2, Line3, and Name fields for more comprehensive address details. The Card model has been updated to make the Number field nullable and includes a new Usage field, along with an updated ThreeDSecure description.
  • Documentation and Enum Refinements: Numerous documentation comments across various models have been updated for improved clarity and to reflect the latest API explorer references. Additionally, enum values for SweepConfigurationV2 reasons and VerificationError types have been adjusted to align with current definitions.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request consists of automated code generation to update services and models for configurationwebhooks. The changes include adding several new models, updating comments for clarity, and modifying existing models to align with the latest API specification. The new models and modifications, such as making the Card.Number field optional and adding new address fields, are implemented consistently and correctly. The updates to enum values and documentation comments are also noted. Overall, the changes appear to be a standard and correct update for the API client library, and no issues of medium or higher severity were found.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/configurationwebhooks branch from 33c3347 to f81e807 Compare February 2, 2026 09:13
Copy link
Contributor

@jeandersonbc jeandersonbc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has a change to the signature of exported functions. Marking this as a breaking change.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

new model added

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

optional fields added to existing model

Comment on lines -50 to 59
func NewCard(brand string, brandVariant string, cardholderName string, formFactor string, number string) *Card {
func NewCard(brand string, brandVariant string, cardholderName string, formFactor string) *Card {
this := Card{}
this.Brand = brand
this.BrandVariant = brandVariant
this.CardholderName = cardholderName
this.FormFactor = formFactor
this.Number = number
return &this
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

requires changes on projects that already use this model. Marking this as a breaking change.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeandersonbc jeandersonbc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

first pass

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/configurationwebhooks branch from f81e807 to e7e0356 Compare February 9, 2026 12:30
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/configurationwebhooks branch from e7e0356 to 722a883 Compare February 10, 2026 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants