What happened?
Running gqlgen in our project with a few hundred types can lead to >12 GB of memory usage on my local MacBook M2, as well as consuming a large portion of the CPU. It runs for ~1-2 minutes locally, but can take 5 minutes or longer (and event time out) in our CI pipelines, likely due to memory constraints.
This seems to be due to binding medium-to-large Go packages, either through autobind or specifically binding particular models.
If I run gqlgen with a tiny dummy GQL schema and no Go bindings, the process uses ~500 MB and finishes within a few seconds. However if I declare a type binding to a single medium-to-large Go package, the process requires 3-5GB depending on the package, and takes >10s. This is true even if I bind to a tiny Go package that happens to import one of the larger packages.
Our real project of course binds to a number of packages, so we see even greater memory usage.
What did you expect?
Much lower memory usage, faster generation times on memory constrained systems.
Minimal graphql.schema and models to reproduce
Simply specifying an autobind to one of our larger packages with this tiny schema causes the problem.
versions
go run github.com/99designs/gqlgen version v0.17.45
go version go version go1.21.8 darwin/arm64
What happened?
Running gqlgen in our project with a few hundred types can lead to >12 GB of memory usage on my local MacBook M2, as well as consuming a large portion of the CPU. It runs for ~1-2 minutes locally, but can take 5 minutes or longer (and event time out) in our CI pipelines, likely due to memory constraints.
This seems to be due to binding medium-to-large Go packages, either through
autobindor specifically binding particular models.If I run gqlgen with a tiny dummy GQL schema and no Go bindings, the process uses ~500 MB and finishes within a few seconds. However if I declare a type binding to a single medium-to-large Go package, the process requires 3-5GB depending on the package, and takes >10s. This is true even if I bind to a tiny Go package that happens to import one of the larger packages.
Our real project of course binds to a number of packages, so we see even greater memory usage.
What did you expect?
Much lower memory usage, faster generation times on memory constrained systems.
Minimal graphql.schema and models to reproduce
Simply specifying an
autobindto one of our larger packages with this tiny schema causes the problem.versions
go run github.com/99designs/gqlgen versionv0.17.45go versiongo version go1.21.8 darwin/arm64