Commit d694d96
committed
README: Add a deploy example with raw image-spec layouts
For folks who want to diverge as little as possible from things
already in image-spec. Downsides to this approach include:
* Non-sharded blobs [1], although it's not clear to me that modern
filesystems suffer from having many entries in one directory [2].
* Possible duplicate blobs between two layouts. You can address this
with symlinks or similar, but you'd need extra tooling to do that.
With a single CAS bucket, there's only one place that the blob could
be, so deduping is free (but garbage collection becomes more
complicated).
[1]: opencontainers/image-spec#449
[2]: opencontainers/image-spec#94 (comment)1 parent 513946b commit d694d96
1 file changed
Lines changed: 35 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
140 | 140 | | |
141 | 141 | | |
142 | 142 | | |
| 143 | + | |
| 144 | + | |
| 145 | + | |
| 146 | + | |
| 147 | + | |
| 148 | + | |
| 149 | + | |
| 150 | + | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
143 | 176 | | |
144 | 177 | | |
| 178 | + | |
| 179 | + | |
145 | 180 | | |
0 commit comments