-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 955
Expand wait condition time for slave selection test #2604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand wait condition time for slave selection test #2604
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unstable #2604 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 72.21% 72.26% +0.04%
============================================
Files 127 127
Lines 70777 70820 +43
============================================
+ Hits 51114 51179 +65
+ Misses 19663 19641 -22 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
please fix the DCO |
Signed-off-by: Vitali Arbuzov <[email protected]>
ed1190f to
449956e
Compare
Fixed ✅ |
Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Binbin <[email protected]>
…2612) With #2604 merged, the `Node #10 should eventually replicate node #5` started passing successfully with valgrind, but I guess we are seeing a new daily failure from a `New Master down consecutively` test that runs shortly after. Signed-off-by: Sarthak Aggarwal <[email protected]>
## Summary - extend replication wait time in `slave-selection` test ``` *** [err]: Node valkey-io#10 should eventually replicate node valkey-io#5 in tests/unit/cluster/slave-selection.tcl valkey-io#10 didn't became slave of valkey-io#5 ``` ## Testing - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection` - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection --valgrind` Signed-off-by: Vitali Arbuzov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]>
…alkey-io#2612) With valkey-io#2604 merged, the `Node valkey-io#10 should eventually replicate node valkey-io#5` started passing successfully with valgrind, but I guess we are seeing a new daily failure from a `New Master down consecutively` test that runs shortly after. Signed-off-by: Sarthak Aggarwal <[email protected]>
## Summary - extend replication wait time in `slave-selection` test ``` *** [err]: Node #10 should eventually replicate node #5 in tests/unit/cluster/slave-selection.tcl #10 didn't became slave of #5 ``` ## Testing - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection` - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection --valgrind` Signed-off-by: Vitali Arbuzov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]>
…2612) With #2604 merged, the `Node #10 should eventually replicate node #5` started passing successfully with valgrind, but I guess we are seeing a new daily failure from a `New Master down consecutively` test that runs shortly after. Signed-off-by: Sarthak Aggarwal <[email protected]>
|
@vitarb @enjoy-binbin looks like the test failed again recently 2 days back: https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/actions/runs/18081789287/job/51446150777#step:6:12830 Should we further increase the wait time? |
|
Also 3 days back, https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/actions/runs/18066680642/job/51410287680#step:6:11341. All with valgrind enabled. |
## Summary - extend replication wait time in `slave-selection` test ``` *** [err]: Node valkey-io#10 should eventually replicate node valkey-io#5 in tests/unit/cluster/slave-selection.tcl valkey-io#10 didn't became slave of valkey-io#5 ``` ## Testing - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection` - `./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection --valgrind` Signed-off-by: Vitali Arbuzov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Binbin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]>
…alkey-io#2612) With valkey-io#2604 merged, the `Node valkey-io#10 should eventually replicate node valkey-io#5` started passing successfully with valgrind, but I guess we are seeing a new daily failure from a `New Master down consecutively` test that runs shortly after. Signed-off-by: Sarthak Aggarwal <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Harkrishn Patro <[email protected]>
Summary
slave-selectiontest, this should address failures such as https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/actions/runs/17567668742/job/49897703622Testing
./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection./runtest --single unit/cluster/slave-selection --valgrind