fix(t8s-cluster/management-cluster): migrate missed field after upgrade - #1910
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA Helm chart template was restructured to nest the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @cwrau, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a configuration issue by migrating a field within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the KubeadmControlPlaneTemplate specification to align with an API upgrade, as indicated by the pull request title. The rolloutBefore field has been refactored into rollout.before. This change is consistent with API evolutions where related fields are grouped. The modification is concise, targeted, and appears to be a necessary fix to adapt to the new API version. I find no issues with this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR fixes a field structure that was missed during the migration to CAPI v1beta2. The rolloutBefore field in the KubeadmControlPlaneTemplate spec is being migrated to the correct nested structure rollout.before, which aligns with the v1beta2 API requirements.
Changes:
- Migrated
rolloutBefore.certificatesExpiryDaysto the nested structurerollout.before.certificatesExpiryDaysin the KubeadmControlPlaneTemplate spec
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [9.5.1](t8s-cluster-v9.5.0...t8s-cluster-v9.5.1) (2026-01-16) ### Bug Fixes * **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** migrate missed field after upgrade ([#1910](#1910)) ([dcf8d1d](dcf8d1d)) ### Miscellaneous Chores * **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update helm release openstack-cloud-controller-manager to v2.34.2 ([#1911](#1911)) ([7bab0b4](7bab0b4)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.