[dualtor][route_check] filter out soc_ipv6 (sonic-net#2899)

What I did
Skip soc_ipv6 when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries on active-active dualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only.

sign-off: Jing Zhang [email protected]

How I did it
How to verify it
Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.

Author: zjswhhh

scripts/route_check.py

@@ -582,8 +582,12 @@ def get_soc_ips(config_db):
     mux_table = config_db.get_table('MUX_CABLE')
     soc_ips = []
     for _, mux_entry in mux_table.items():
-        if mux_entry.get("cable_type", "") == "active-active" and "soc_ipv4" in mux_entry:
-            soc_ips.append(mux_entry["soc_ipv4"])
+        if mux_entry.get("cable_type", "") == "active-active":
+            if "soc_ipv4" in mux_entry and mux_entry["soc_ipv4"]:
+                soc_ips.append(mux_entry["soc_ipv4"])
+
+            if "soc_ipv6" in mux_entry and mux_entry["soc_ipv6"]:
+                soc_ips.append(mux_entry["soc_ipv6"])
 
     return soc_ips
 

tests/route_check_test_data.py

@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@
                         "server_ipv4": "192.168.0.2/32",
                         "server_ipv6": "fc02:1000::2/128",
                         "soc_ipv4": "192.168.0.3/32",
+                        "soc_ipv6": "fc02:1000::3/128",
                         "state": "auto"
                     },
                 }
@@ -356,7 +357,8 @@
                 RT_ENTRY_TABLE: {
                     RT_ENTRY_KEY_PREFIX + "192.168.0.2/32" + RT_ENTRY_KEY_SUFFIX: {},
                     RT_ENTRY_KEY_PREFIX + "fc02:1000::2/128" + RT_ENTRY_KEY_SUFFIX: {},
-                    RT_ENTRY_KEY_PREFIX + "192.168.0.3/32" + RT_ENTRY_KEY_SUFFIX: {}
+                    RT_ENTRY_KEY_PREFIX + "192.168.0.3/32" + RT_ENTRY_KEY_SUFFIX: {},
+                    RT_ENTRY_KEY_PREFIX + "fc02:1000::3/128" + RT_ENTRY_KEY_SUFFIX: {}
                 }
             }
         }