Skip to content

Conversation

@dizcza
Copy link
Contributor

@dizcza dizcza commented Sep 11, 2018

Addresses #599.

Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This overall looks good, thanks!

But this patch makes MNIST Python3 only, so this needs to be changed.

pass
else:
raise
os.makedirs(self.raw_folder, exist_ok=True)

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@dizcza
Copy link
Contributor Author

dizcza commented Sep 16, 2018

Ready.

Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks very good, and is almost ready to be merged.
I have a single comment, can you address it so that I can merge this?

Thanks a lot, the code is looking much better!

Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@fmassa fmassa merged commit e564f13 into pytorch:master Sep 17, 2018
knakad added a commit to knakad/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2019
This commit will modify the folder structure to avoid needing to
download the datasets and relying on the dataset website from being
available.
This caused a canary to fail (TT-0407832742).

The dependency has existed since Pytorch 1.1 upgrade, as the directory
structure was modified in pytorch/vision#601
knakad added a commit to aws/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2019
This commit will modify the folder structure to avoid needing to
download the datasets and relying on the dataset website from being
available.
This caused a canary to fail.

The dependency has existed since Pytorch 1.1 upgrade, as the directory
structure was modified in pytorch/vision#601
rajveerb pushed a commit to rajveerb/vision that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants