Skip to content

Include new option in cherry-picker config dict#639

Merged
ambv merged 5 commits into
python:mainfrom
Jackenmen:patch-1
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Include new option in cherry-picker config dict#639
ambv merged 5 commits into
python:mainfrom
Jackenmen:patch-1

Conversation

@Jackenmen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will be necessary when python/cherry-picker#70 is merged. It would maybe be somewhat better to use cherry_picker.load_config() (or simply not specify the config which will default to the equivalent cherry_picker.DEFAULT_CONFIG) instead of hard-coding the configuration but I opted to just keep this consistent with what's already in the code base.

Since this project doesn't pin the version of cherry-picker, the merge of this will need to happen before the merge of the aforementioned PR. I haven't received feedback on the name of this config option though so I'm not entirely sure if it will stay like this.

@Jackenmen

This comment was marked as resolved.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f647d98) to head (6668c47).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #639   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          360       360           
  Branches        14        14           
=========================================
  Hits           360       360           
Flag Coverage Δ
Python_3.11 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Python_3.12 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Python_3.13 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Comment thread miss_islington/tasks.py
@ambv ambv merged commit f07d8a7 into python:main Jan 15, 2025
@Jackenmen Jackenmen deleted the patch-1 branch January 15, 2025 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants