dma-buf: fix use of DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_{A,B} in userspace

The typedefs u32 and u64 are not available in userspace. Thus user get
an error he try to use DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A or DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:

    $ gcc -Wall   -c -MMD -c -o ioctls_list.o ioctls_list.c
    In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm/ioctl.h:1,
                     from /usr/include/linux/ioctl.h:5,
                     from /usr/include/asm-generic/ioctls.h:5,
                     from ioctls_list.c:11:
    ioctls_list.c:463:29: error: ‘u32’ undeclared here (not in a function)
      463 |     { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h
          |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ioctls_list.c:464:29: error: ‘u64’ undeclared here (not in a function)
      464 |     { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h
          |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The issue was initially reported here[1].

[1]: jerome-pouiller/ioctl#14

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Fixes: a5bff92 ("dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi")
CC: [email protected]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>

Author: jerome-pouiller

include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
  * between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers.
  */
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
-#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
-#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, __u32)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, __u64)
 
 #endif