Skip to content

Conversation

@jamessewell
Copy link
Collaborator

This one is a little wafty, but then so is the subject. It's also very, very poorly indexed so I would love to get this out ASAP

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
website Error Error Oct 20, 2025 8:40am

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

Copy link
Member

@philippemnoel philippemnoel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’m not sure about this one. I don’t really think we’re sharing anything super informative here. If you think it will help SEO, then sure.

I’m also not convinced that agentic search is different. Yeah the data is very structured and agents are good at writing SQL. But the whole iterating queries from results and such is exactly what humans do. Agents presumably do it faster, but is it really that different?

I’m also not convinced in the argument that it differs from RAG because RAG is hidden vs agentic search isn’t. At the end of the day people interact with agents via natural language and even though the chain of thought/set of search queries may be displayed as the agent thinks, it is still abstracted away.

What I think could be a more interesting topic to share about agentic search is that:

  • agents are good at writing SQL, making search engines that are SQL native ideal. Eg nested queries with CTEs are hard for humans to reason about but easy for agents.
  • Agents work by doing a lot of fast, short searches that build on each other. This makes keyword search a very strong fit for them, instead of vector search, which is inherently slower and more expensive (due to the vector search but also to the need to create embeddings). Agents search more « in real time ». Can use the Claude code announcements of using bm25 as an example

Those feel like more precise arguments to me that actually teach the user something new

- **Programmatic Iteration**: Rapidly reformulate queries based on result analysis, testing different keywords, filters, or search methods within milliseconds
- **Persistent Context**: Maintain search context across multiple queries, using early findings to inform later query formulation and result evaluation

The most common way to enable agents is to expose search interfaces as tools in an MCP (model context protocol) server, but there are also other options like cetnering the search around a single technology that can access to all types of search. SQL makes a good candidate for this pattern.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants