Extend custom_property limits #178060
Replies: 5 comments
-
| 💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩ 
 Where to look to see what's shipping 👀 
 What you can do in the meantime 💻 
 As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Increase the string property length to 1024 and the multi-select options to 20,000. This allows storing and linking thousands of component UUIDs per repository, enabling metadata sync and rules enforcement at scale. This is quite common I also face this.Current constraints pose real challenges for mapping of components, and your proposals make sense — especially as internal system integrations become more common.Also please report the same to GitHub also I do but if many do make things become so simple.I hope I answer your question :) | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Hi Etienne 👋 This is a fantastic use case, and you've clearly identified the scaling bottlenecks with Custom Repository Properties for large environments and monorepos. You are not alone in hitting these walls! Short-Term Workaround: External Mapping While we wait for GitHub to expand these limits: Support for Your Proposal Extending the string limit (e.g., to 1024 characters) and the multi-select limit (e.g., to 20,000 options) makes perfect sense for enterprise governance and scale. | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Hi Etienne, Current constraints pose real challenges for mapping thousands of components, and your proposals make sense — especially as internal system integrations become more common. In the meantime, workarounds (single catalog key reference, API mapping, sync via GitHub Actions) can help, but a true extension would be best for direct metadata storage and automation. I hope GitHub prioritizes this feature for advanced users! | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Hello,
We are trying to link our repositories to our internal software component catalog. Each component has a unique UUID, and we want to store these UUIDs in a custom_property on the corresponding repository.
Our goal:
The problem:
Our use case is blocked by the current limitations, especially for our monorepos which contain many components:
Our proposition:
BR,
Etienne
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions