Too bad about sponsorship privacy limitations imposed by microsoft/github #166796
Replies: 1 comment
-
| 💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩ 
 Where to look to see what's shipping 👀 
 What you can do in the meantime 💻 
 As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Microsoft purchased github quite some time ago and it certainly isn't unexpected the things they do with the platform. After all, their end-goal is profit and I'm certainly not opposed to that.
Problem is, I often run head-long into issues anytime I deal directly or indirectly with microsoft or any of it's products because it's a constant and disrespectful onslaught of information-gathering at every turn (ever use Windows, for example?). This is why I left all microsoft products behind about a decade ago.
Now microsoft is again an impediment for me since they own this platform and have therefore injected themselves between myself and my independent software developers. Clever strategy on their part, forcing every single person that wishes to donate to a developer to expose personal and private information in addition to prohibiting the use of virtual cards. These hoops are absolutely unnecessary and irrelevant to safely making payment to developers of my choice and it's a sad shame microsoft imposes these selfish artificial barriers that prohibit safety and security conscious users from providing potentially substantial aid to independent open-source projects.
To the trolls that may respond to this apologizing for microsoft in the name of safety and security, well, all I can say is that argument falls flat on me. I'm 30 years in the IT space and I know from behind the curtain the real motivations of microsoft's dark-pattern behavior.
My two cents, which considering inflation is worth about half that.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions