Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 15, 2024. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on May 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

Future Plans and Interoperability With OCI Reference Types #96

@dlorenc

Description

@dlorenc

Moving the discussion from #88 over to here.

I'm curious what the future plans for this specification are, and how it is expected to interact with the work happening in the OCI Reference Types WG. A few questions:

Are both expected to be supported long term?

Is this an alternative to the work produced from the OCI, or an extension? What's the best way to think about how they're related?

Is there a difference in functionality? How should client tooling decide which to use?

I'm a bit worried this is going to lead to fragmentation of the OCI specifications and registry operators/clients will be forced to choose to support one or the other here. Even if registries support both, it could lead to a confusing story for end users and clients. Have there been any discussions or plans on how this will be surfaced to end users/clients?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions