The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: iturgut / name: Ilayda Turgut (899ab14, 91b8466)

@gnmeyer I'm a bit confused here.
Do we need all those new rendered files, just for the IPv6 example?
Isn't just this file enough?
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-helm-charts/pull/1872/files#diff-060f881c5ce99f9f5f8721f35c1e7c615d225ff40c17e3983a3c0d77057c0607

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

The rendered files were made from the make generate-examples command as a target from the Makefile.
Looking at the other examples, they also have the rendered out files. Unless one of the workflows runs the make generate-examples command, all of these files should be fine to be merged in.

The rendered files were made from the make generate-examples command as a target from the Makefile. Looking at the other examples, they also have the rendered out files. Unless one of the workflows runs the make generate-examples command, all of these files should be fine to be merged in.

Yes, but that's because we are adding a "new" example.
My question is, do we need that new example?

I'm asking because every single example we add, we have hundreds of extra lines of code generated, that need to be maintained.

I agree we dont need a new example for this situation.

Alright, that's fair. I reverted the example and kept the updates to the opentelemetry-demo/values.yaml