timers: fix processing of nested same delay timers

Whenever a timer of a specific delay creates a new timer with the same
delay we currently end up processing the new timer immediately instead
of scheduling the timer to run in the future.  This commit basically
identifies the situation, halts processing the current timer chain and
reschedules the timer chain appropriately in the future.

Fixes #25607

Author: whitlockjc

lib/timers.js

@@ -87,13 +87,18 @@ function listOnTimeout() {
 
   var first;
   while (first = L.peek(list)) {
-    // If the previous iteration caused a timer to be added,
-    // update the value of "now" so that timing computations are
-    // done correctly. See test/simple/test-timers-blocking-callback.js
-    // for more information.
+    // Whenever a timer creates a new timer in the current list being processed
+    // you can end up processing the new timer immediately instead of waiting
+    // the scheduled time.  Whenever we encounter this situation stop
+    // processing this list and reschedule.  (Issue 25607)
     if (now < first._monotonicStartTime) {
-      now = Timer.now();
-      debug('now: %d', now);
+      var delay = msecs - (Timer.now() - first._monotonicStartTime);
+      if (delay < 0) {
+        delay = 0;
+      }
+      debug(msecs + ' list wait because timer was added from another timer');
+      list.start(delay, 0);
+      return;
     }
 
     var diff = now - first._monotonicStartTime;