Address review feedback

Author: shakuzen

benchmarks/benchmarks-core/src/jmh/java/io/micrometer/benchmark/BenchmarkSupport.java

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
  */
 package io.micrometer.benchmark;
 
-import io.micrometer.common.lang.Nullable;
+import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
 import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode;
 import org.openjdk.jmh.profile.GCProfiler;
 import org.openjdk.jmh.profile.LinuxPerfAsmProfiler;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ public static ChainedOptionsBuilder defaults() {
             .warmupTime(new TimeValue(5L, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
             // 9.5m benchmarks
             .measurementIterations(57)
-            .measurementTime(new TimeValue(5L, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
+            .measurementTime(new TimeValue(10L, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
             .mode(Mode.AverageTime)
             .timeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
             .shouldDoGC(true)

benchmarks/benchmarks-core/src/jmh/java/io/micrometer/benchmark/core/instrument/config/filter/MeterFilterCommonTagsBenchmark.java

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ public class MeterFilterCommonTagsBenchmark {
     public int supplied;
 
     @Param({ "0", "1", "2", "4", "8", "16", "32", "64" })
-    public int ignored;
+    public int commonTagCount;
 
     private Meter.Id[] samples;
 
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ public class MeterFilterCommonTagsBenchmark {
     public void setUp() {
         samples = FilterBenchmarkSupport.distributed(supplied).limit(COUNT).toArray(Meter.Id[]::new);
 
-        instances = TagsBenchmarkSupport.containers(ignored)
+        instances = TagsBenchmarkSupport.containers(commonTagCount)
             // Using List and not Tags to simulate the worst case
             // scenario. We're most interested in saving the performance
             // where it suffers most.

benchmarks/benchmarks-core/src/jmh/java/io/micrometer/benchmark/core/instrument/config/filter/MeterFilterIgnoreTagsBenchmark.java

@@ -26,9 +26,10 @@
 import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
 
 /**
- * Evaluates performance of {@link MeterFilter#commonTags(Iterable)}. To simulate at least
- * a somewhat realistic scenario and prevent false JIT assumptions, the input identifiers
- * have an arbitrary number of tags (0 to 64), having a prominent mode of [supplied].
+ * Evaluates performance of {@link MeterFilter#ignoreTags(String...)}. To simulate at
+ * least a somewhat realistic scenario and prevent false JIT assumptions, the input
+ * identifiers have an arbitrary number of tags (0 to 64), having a prominent mode of
+ * [supplied].
  */
 // Use jvmArgsAppend = "-XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,*.Tags.*" and
 // similar wildcards if you need to check clean assembly output