Skip to content

Conversation

@simllll
Copy link
Contributor

@simllll simllll commented Oct 22, 2025

rebase after #783

Description

checks deepgram eager to return event for preemptive generation

Changes Made

took over the python implementatoin https://github.com/livekit/agents/blob/d19519d602eaae8f212d4f93252c05792b7b3a66/livekit-plugins/livekit-plugins-deepgram/livekit/plugins/deepgram/stt_v2.py#L469

Pre-Review Checklist

  • Build passes: All builds (lint, typecheck, tests) pass locally
  • AI-generated code reviewed: Removed unnecessary comments and ensured code quality
  • Changes explained: All changes are properly documented and justified above
  • Scope appropriate: All changes relate to the PR title, or explanations provided for why they're included

Testing

  • Automated tests added/updated (if applicable)
  • All tests pass
  • Make sure both restaurant_agent.ts and realtime_agent.ts work properly (for major changes)

Additional Notes


Note to reviewers: Please ensure the pre-review checklist is completed before starting your review.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: edfbd5d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@simllll simllll changed the title Feat/preemptive gen deepgram stt deepgram stt PREFLIGHT_TRANSCRIPT event Oct 22, 2025
@simllll simllll force-pushed the feat/preemptive-gen-deepgram-stt branch from b1f3b69 to bb436cf Compare November 12, 2025 10:58
@simllll
Copy link
Contributor Author

simllll commented Nov 12, 2025

rebased to see the changes easier, but left the isEquivalent in there for now even though it's not used (yet)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant