Update 4-goal.md

[LazyYuuki]

Describe Your Changes

Fixes Issues

• Closes #
• Closes #

Self Checklist

• Added relevant comments, esp in complex areas
• Updated docs (for bug fixes / features)
• Created issues for follow-up changes or refactoring needed

---

Important

Update 4-goal.md template to improve clarity with emojis and reorganized sections.

• Template Update:
  • Updates 4-goal.md to include emojis in section headers for better visual distinction.
  • Replaces Success Criteria, Non Goals, User research, Design inspo with Scope, Out of Scope, Deliverables, and Open questions.
  • Removes specific examples and links sections to streamline the template.

^{This description was created by for 78d816b. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to 78d816b in 2 minutes and 2 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 51 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/4-goal.md:23

• Draft comment:
  For consistency, add a space after the emoji in '❓Open questions'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 20% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely stylistic and does not provide any substantial feedback or suggestion related to the code functionality or logic. It focuses on formatting, which is not critical to the code's operation.

2. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/4-goal.md:15

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: "High lever description" should be "High level description".
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

3. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/4-goal.md:21

• Draft comment:
  Typographical/grammatical error: "What we are the tangible deliverables for this goal" should be rephrased. Consider changing it to "What are the tangible deliverables for this goal".
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the grammar correction is technically correct, this is a minor issue in a comment template. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. The rules state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. Grammar fixes in comments (not even in code) are very low priority. The grammar error could make the template look unprofessional. Poor grammar in templates gets replicated across many issues. While true, this is still a very minor issue that doesn't impact functionality or understanding. The rules explicitly say not to make unimportant comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor to be worth addressing in a PR review. Grammar in comments is not important enough to warrant a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_D5BT60N9LsUEhpJu

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}