Skip to content

Conversation

@urmauur
Copy link
Member

@urmauur urmauur commented Sep 3, 2025

Describe Your Changes

This pull request makes a small adjustment to the formatDate utility function. The change removes the explicit setting of the time zone to UTC, allowing the formatted date to use the user's local time zone instead.

Fixes Issues

Self Checklist

  • Added relevant comments, esp in complex areas
  • Updated docs (for bug fixes / features)
  • Created issues for follow-up changes or refactoring needed

Important

Removes timeZone: 'UTC' from formatDate in formatDate.ts to use local timezone.

This description was created by Ellipsis for ae12441. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@urmauur urmauur force-pushed the fix/timestamp-issue branch from ae12441 to 0ea9da9 Compare September 3, 2025 10:12
@urmauur urmauur added this to the v0.7.0 milestone Sep 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to ae12441 in 53 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 12 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. web-app/src/utils/formatDate.ts:18
  • Draft comment:
    Update outdated comment: It still refers to a fixed UTC timezone for stable tests even though the timezone parameter was removed. Consider updating or removing this comment to avoid confusion.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_yatTedAQol2g2fGM

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@urmauur urmauur moved this to Needs Review in Jan Sep 3, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Barecheck - Code coverage report

Total: 35.86%

Your code coverage diff: 0.02% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

@Minh141120
Copy link
Member

LGTM!
image
image

@urmauur urmauur merged commit 2801fde into dev Sep 3, 2025
16 checks passed
@urmauur urmauur deleted the fix/timestamp-issue branch September 3, 2025 11:04
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Review to QA in Jan Sep 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: the timestamp displayed in the thread UI does not match the actual current time

3 participants