Don't explicitly forbid tunnels #540
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
I'm not sure if CI broke because some tests don't tolerate the new (and unexpected) packets coming through the tunnel interfaces of the testing rig? Or was it already broken? |
…er IP to broadcast. This should make icecream work across WireGuard connections.
Contributor
|
The tests broke because they cannot find a localhost interface for a broadcast, presumably your test changed the logic there. Run "make test" to reproduce the problem. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This blocked me from adding a worker host to a scheduler through a WireGuard connection.
And since it was already in the TODO, and seemed like an easy fix... here we are!