expect: Improve report when matcher fails, part 7

[pedrottimark]

Summary

For 4 matchers which correspond to >, >=, <, <= number comparison operators:

• Display matcher name in regular black instead of dim color
• Repeat not and operator following Expected: label

For more information, see discussion with @jeysal in #7795

For these matchers which define expected intervals, I have not thought of any additional way to reduce apparent weirdness when received value is equal to expected boundary.

Residue for future pull request, in call to ensureNumbers helper function:

• Delete period in matcher name to display matcher name in regular black instead of dim color
• Provide options as argument to display promise and isNot

Test plan

Updated 66 snapshots. To save mental effort, review as 33 adjacent pairs of snapshots.

	matcher
14	toBeGreaterThan
19	toBeGreaterThanOrEqual
14	toBeLessThan
19	toBeLessThanOrEqual

Here are pictures for 2 out of 4 matchers:

• beyond baseline at left (matcher name already black instead of dim)
• improved at right

[thymikee]

Looking sharp

[SimenB]

Oh yeah, this is awesome!

[jeysal]

Great that we found a format we're both happy with 👍

[pedrottimark]

Finally catching up, this pull request provides concise solution to problem reported in #7105

/cc @Abhishek-Modi-Happyperks @joanasmramos

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.