Allow eslint-plugin-jest to recognize more disabled tests#4533
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4533 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 55.98% 56.1% +0.12%
=========================================
Files 185 185
Lines 6236 6254 +18
Branches 3 3
=========================================
+ Hits 3491 3509 +18
Misses 2744 2744
Partials 1 1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@SimenB mind reviewing this one? |
|
@borilla Could you rename the file/rule in a separate commit to make reviewing easier? 🙂 First glance looks good, but according to github everything changed |
|
I've renamed the file back to the original so it's easier to see the diffs |
Already recognizes: * tests that append `skip` (e.g. `it.skip(...)`) * tests that prepend `x` (e.g. `xit(...)`) This change adds: * tests that don't contain a function body * tests that contain a call to `pending()` https://jasmine.github.io/2.0/introduction.html#section-Pending_Specs
|
Great, thank you! Makes reading the new test cases way easier 🙂 The change LGTM. 👍 Feel free to rename the file back |
| it: false, | ||
| jasmine: false, | ||
| jest: false, | ||
| pending: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I honestly didn't realize we exposed this global…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have to admit I wasn't even aware of it myself until I checked out the docs for Jasmine
|
Thanks for doing this! |
Already recognizes: * tests that append `skip` (e.g. `it.skip(...)`) * tests that prepend `x` (e.g. `xit(...)`) This change adds: * tests that don't contain a function body * tests that contain a call to `pending()` https://jasmine.github.io/2.0/introduction.html#section-Pending_Specs
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
5 participants
Summary
This change affects the
jest/no-disabled-testsrule of the Jest eslint pluginThis update allows the rule to recognize more disabled/skipped/pending tests, in line with information for Pending Specs in Jasmine
The existing rule already recognizes:
it.skip(...))xit(...))This change adds:
it('foo')")it('foo', () => { pending(); }))Test plan
Additional test cases for the rule changes have been added to
__tests__/no_disabled_tests.test.js[This file was renamed from
__tests__/no_skipped_tests.test.jsto better match both the rule-name and the source file name it is testing]