-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.6k
core/{.,state,vm},miner,ethr/tracers: implement 7709 #31015
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ | |
| package core | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "encoding/binary" | ||
| "fmt" | ||
| "math/big" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ func (p *StateProcessor) Process(block *types.Block, statedb *state.StateDB, cfg | |
| ProcessBeaconBlockRoot(*beaconRoot, evm) | ||
| } | ||
| if p.config.IsPrague(block.Number(), block.Time()) { | ||
| ProcessParentBlockHash(block.ParentHash(), evm) | ||
| ProcessParentBlockHash(block.ParentHash(), evm, p.config.IsVerkle(block.Number(), block.Time())) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Iterate over and process the individual transactions | ||
|
|
@@ -234,14 +235,24 @@ func ProcessBeaconBlockRoot(beaconRoot common.Hash, evm *vm.EVM) { | |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // ProcessParentBlockHash stores the parent block hash in the history storage contract | ||
| // as per EIP-2935. | ||
| func ProcessParentBlockHash(prevHash common.Hash, evm *vm.EVM) { | ||
| // as per EIP-2935/7709. | ||
| func ProcessParentBlockHash(prevHash common.Hash, evm *vm.EVM, is7709 bool) { | ||
| if tracer := evm.Config.Tracer; tracer != nil { | ||
| onSystemCallStart(tracer, evm.GetVMContext()) | ||
| if tracer.OnSystemCallEnd != nil { | ||
| defer tracer.OnSystemCallEnd() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if is7709 { | ||
| // currently 8192 for kautinen7, to be changed to 8 (and made a constant) for kaustinen8 | ||
| ringIndex := (evm.Context.BlockNumber.Uint64() - 1) % params.HistoryServeWindow | ||
| var key common.Hash | ||
| binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(key[24:], ringIndex) | ||
| evm.StateDB.SetState(params.SystemAddress, key, prevHash) | ||
| evm.StateDB.AccessEvents().SlotGas(params.SystemAddress, key, true) | ||
| evm.StateDB.Finalise(false) | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I am wondering if it's necessary. If Verkle is enabled, SStore will be replaced with
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess this doesn't actually invoke any contract, just does the ugly and sets the slot. Which necessitates also setting the access-event.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But why not invoking the contract? The gas charging, slot warming can all be done automatically in this way.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. so you might have missed the gist of conversations I had over this topic. There are several issues with invoking a contract:
Only 3 and 4 are relevant to this issue, but system contracts are generally a bad idea in my view.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The conclusion was that, we would deprecate calling system contracts in verkle. |
||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| msg := &Message{ | ||
| From: params.SystemAddress, | ||
| GasLimit: 30_000_000, | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why to use
SystemAddresshere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
because that's what is used on the testnet, it's older than the current 2935 address.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the devnet was launched even before the 2935 contract deployment?