Skip to content

Conversation

@markflarup
Copy link
Contributor

I happened to have introduced a bug with pr #11 🙁

SOPS was no longer able to save the file as the buffer was read-only.
Invoking sops-save-file returned *Messages* buffer: funcall-interactively: Buffer is read-only: #<buffer foo.yaml>.

Manually disabling read-only-mode before invoking sops-edit-file made it possible to encrypt the file with sops-save-file.

I've fixed this by disabling read-only-mode before the buffer is erased and re-enabling read-only-mode when the buffer is saved. This allows for editing and saving a sops encrypted file, while still preventing the user from accidentally editing an encrypted file (hence the need to enable read-only-mode again).

Sorry for the inconvenience.

@djgoku
Copy link
Owner

djgoku commented Feb 6, 2025

I'll just back out the last commit for now. I hope it doesn't cause too much of an issue with your workflow.

I wrote a few extra tests for your pr and never pushed them. Let me get them added and then add a few more before circling back here.

@markflarup
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll just back out the last commit for now. I hope it doesn't cause too much of an issue with your workflow.

No worries and don't stress it. I've been working of my fork since I realized this today. You can say this change has been vetted a bit more already.

I wrote a few extra tests for your pr and never pushed them. Let me get them added and then add a few more before circling back here.

Sweet! I'm eager to see how they're written. Elisp is quite new to me and the testing aspect is definitely uncharted territory.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants